"What's China's comment?" Confrontational maneuvering in spokespersons' argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Leiden Repository

"What's China's comment?" Confrontational maneuvering in spokespersons' argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Type: Doctoral Thesis
Title: "What's China's comment?" Confrontational maneuvering in spokespersons' argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Author: Wu, P.
Issue Date: 2020-02-25
Keywords: Diplomatic press conference discourse
Spokespersons' argumentative discourse
Pragma-Dialectics
Strategic maneuvering
Argumentative strategies
Abstract: Adopting the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, this research intends to provide a fully-fledged analysis of a crucial phase in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (China’s MoFA for short), viz. the empirical counterpart of the confrontation stage in the spokespersons’ argumentative exchanges with the questioning journalists. The central aim of this research is to make clear how the spokespersons maneuver strategically in responding to the journalists’ questions and how their confrontational maneuvering can be instrumental in convincing the intended audience. In realizing this central aim, three main research questions are to be answered:(1) What are the institutional preconditions applying to China’s MoFA’s regular press conferences as a communicative activity type that serve as extrinsic constraints for the strategic maneuvering of the spokespersons in responding to the questions of the journalists?(2) What modes of confrontational maneuvering are prototypically adopted by the spokespersons in responding to the questions of the journalists in complying with the institutional preconditions of China’s MoFA’s regular press conferences?(3) How are these modes of confrontational maneuvering designed to contribute to making a convincing case for the audience the spokespersons would like to reach?
Promotor: Supervisor: Eemeren F.H. van, Haaften T. van
Faculty: Faculty of Humanities
University: Leiden University
Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/85720
 

Files in this item

Description Size View
application/pdf Full Text 686.3Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25
application/pdf Cover 597.7Kb View/Open
application/pdf Title pages_Contents_Preface 91.25Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 1 120.6Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25
application/pdf Chapter 2 164.2Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25
application/pdf Chapter 3 242.9Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25
application/pdf Chapter 4 225.4Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25 Full text at publisher site
application/pdf Chapter 5 211.9Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25 Full text at publisher site
application/pdf Chapter 6 285.6Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25 Full text at publisher site
application/pdf Chapter 7 233.2Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25
application/pdf Chapter 8 126.9Kb Under embargo until 2021-08-25
application/pdf References 178.9Kb View/Open
application/pdf Summary in English 108.9Kb View/Open
application/pdf Summary in Dutch 109.4Kb View/Open
application/pdf Curriculum Vitae 78.40Kb View/Open
application/pdf Propositions 80.16Kb View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)