Unbundling Open Access dimensions: a conceptual discussion to reduce terminology inconsistencies

Leiden Repository

Unbundling Open Access dimensions: a conceptual discussion to reduce terminology inconsistencies

Type: Article in monograph or in proceedings
Title: Unbundling Open Access dimensions: a conceptual discussion to reduce terminology inconsistencies
Author: Martín-Martín A.Costas R.Leeuwen T. vanDelgado López-Cózar E.
Journal Title: STI 2018 Conference Proceedings
Start Page: 1191
End Page: 1198
Publisher: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)
Issue Date: 2018-09-11
Keywords: Scientometrics
Abstract: The current ways in which documents are made freely accessible in the Web no longer adhere to the models established Budapest/Bethesda/Berlin (BBB) definitions of Open Access (OA). Since those definitions were established, OA-related terminology has expanded, trying to keep up with all the variants of OA publishing that are out there. However, the inconsistent and arbitrary terminology that is being used to refer to these variants are complicating communication about OA-related issues. This study intends to initiate a discussion on this issue, by proposing a conceptual model of OA. Our model features six different dimensions (authoritativeness, user rights, stability, immediacy, peer-review, and cost). Each dimension allows for a range of different options. We believe that by combining the options in these six dimensions, we can arrive at all the current variants of OA, while avoiding ambiguous and/or arbitrary terminology. This model can be an useful tool for funders and policy makers who need to decide exactly which aspects of OA are necessary for each specific scenario.
Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/65276
 

Files in this item

Description Size View
application/pdf STI2018_paper_200.pdf 1.103Mb View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)