Multidominance, ellipsis, and quantifier scope

Leiden Repository

Multidominance, ellipsis, and quantifier scope

Title: Multidominance, ellipsis, and quantifier scope
Author: Temmerman, Tanja Maria Hugo
Publisher: LOT, Utrecht
Issue Date: 2012-06-28
Keywords: negative indefinites, QR, modals, ellipsis, multidominance, cyclicity, linearization, fusion, syntax-PF connection,
Cyclicity
Ellipsis
Fusion
Linearization
Models
Multidominance
Negative indefinites
QR
Syntax-PF connection
Abstract: This dissertation provides a novel perspective on the interaction between quantifier scope and ellipsis. It presents a detailed investigation of the scopal interaction between English negative indefinites, modals, and quantified phrases in ellipsis. One of the crucial observations is that a negative indefinite in object position cannot scope out of a verbal ellipsis site, while Quantifier Raising (QR) of a quantificational object can escape a verbal ellipsis site. This dissertation presents a unified account of this state of affairs in the context of multidominance. It is argued that both English negative indefinites and quantificational determiners decompose into two independent elements. Their formation is the result of a morphological process, Fusion Under Adjacency. The locality/adjacency required for fusion is established under remerge (multidominance), in combination with cyclic Spell-Out/linearization. The main claim of this dissertation is that the PF-process of ellipsis can block this morphological process. It is proposed that the timing of Fusion Under Adjacency and (derivational) ellipsis plays a crucial role: Fusion Under Adjacency has to take place before the ellipsis licensor is merged. The lack of a blocking effect of ellipsis in QR is accounted for by the fact that QR always has a landing site below the ellipsis licensor. In addition to providing an account for the scopal behavior of quantificational elements under ellipsis, this dissertation also sheds new light on the syntax-to-PF mapping. It contributes to our understanding of how multidominant phrase markers are transferred to PF for (non-)pronunciation in a cyclic model of the grammar. This study is of relevance to scholars interested in the nature of ellipsis and quantifier scope, and the syntax-PF connection, as well as to a general syntactic readership.
Description: Promotores: J.E.C.V. Rooryck, J. van Craenenbroeck
With summary in Dutch
Faculty: Faculteit der Letteren
Citation: Temmerman, T.M.H., 2012, Doctoral thesis, Leiden University
Series/Report no.: LOT dissertation series ;303
ISBN: 9789460930867
Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/19158
 

Files in this item

Description Size View
application/pdf Full text 2.664Mb View/Open
application/pdf Cover 1.379Mb View/Open
application/pdf Title page_Contents_Acknowledgements 241.6Kb View/Open
application/pdf Introduction 120.1Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 2 472.8Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 3 943.9Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 4 298.9Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 5 557.1Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 6 Conclusion ans future prospects 178.7Kb View/Open
application/pdf References 251.9Kb View/Open
application/pdf Summary in Dutch 144.1Kb View/Open
application/pdf Curriculum Vitae 82.60Kb View/Open
application/pdf Propositions 89.55Kb View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)