Pickpocket compounds from Latin to Romance

Leiden Repository

Pickpocket compounds from Latin to Romance

Title: Pickpocket compounds from Latin to Romance
Author: Nielsen Whitehead, Benedicte
Publisher: Faculty of the Humanities, Leiden University
Issue Date: 2012-04-26
Keywords: Historical linguistics
Latin
Morphology
Nominal composition
Romance languages
Abstract: This thesis discusses the development in Proto–Indo–European, Latin and Romance of a word–formation pattern which the most adequate terminology in use dubs ‘verbal government compounds with a governing first member’; I use the shorthand ‘pickpocket compounds’. The first member of such compounds derives from a verb, while the second mostly represents its direct object: thus English pickpocket. Most English examples are functionally agent–nouns, referring to the agent of the implied verbal act. Nevertheless, they lack a suffix indicating this. By contrast, the more prolific type of compound agent–noun, represented by truck–driver, has the deverbal member second and carries an agentive suffix, ‑er. Pickpocket compounds are attested in early strata of Greek and Indo–Iranian and in medieval strata of Germanic, Slavic and Romance. Latin has around a dozen examples. The scholarly debate, continued in this thesis, has been centred round two issues: (1) the morphological make–up of the type and (2) its historical origin. (1) is preliminarily assessed in chapter 2, reviewing the basics of nominal composition and providing an account of the fundamental difference between pickpocket and truckdriver compounds. It contains a cursory discussion of Homeric Greek, Indo–Iranian and Germanic representatives. This comparative perspective on the morphology of the type is continued in chapters 3–5 on Latin and Romance. An important conclusion, and an answer to one of the most–discussed questions in the debate, is that these compounds cannot be considered univerbated imperative clauses. (2) is likewise assessed preliminarily in chapter 2, offering an outline of the history of the Greek and Indo–Aryan material. Taking the history of the Latin/Romance material up for revision, chapters 3–5 conclude that Latin offers no evidence in support of a Proto–Indo–European type. The Romance type may have an origin in Latin; however, the theoretical considerations laid out in Chapter 2 suggest that given the relevant typological conditions, new compositional types may arise spontaneously. Finally, the medieval Germanic and Slavic types result from Romance adstrate and have no bearing on Proto–Indo–European; see the summary discussion in 6.3.
Description: Promotor: A.M. Lubotsky
With summary in Dutch
Faculty: Faculteit der Letteren
Citation: Nielsen Whitehead, B., 2012, Doctoral thesis, Leiden University
Sponsor: The Danish Research Council
Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/18706
 

Files in this item

Description Size View
application/pdf Full text 162.0Mb View/Open
application/pdf Title page_Cont ... lum Vitae_Acknowledgements 1.547Mb View/Open
application/pdf Summary_Summary in Dutch 943.9Kb View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)