The rise and fall of Sauropus (Phyllanthaceae) : a molecular phylogenetic analysis of Sauropus and allies

Leiden Repository

The rise and fall of Sauropus (Phyllanthaceae) : a molecular phylogenetic analysis of Sauropus and allies

Type: Doctoral Thesis
Title: The rise and fall of Sauropus (Phyllanthaceae) : a molecular phylogenetic analysis of Sauropus and allies
Author: Pruesapan, Kanchana
Publisher: Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis (section NHN), PITA group, Leiden University Branch
Issue Date: 2010-11-23
Keywords: Breynia
Molecular phylogeny
Phyllanthaceae
Sauropus
Synostemon
Abstract: Molecular phylogenetic studies focused on the genus Phyllanthus L. (Phyllanthaceae) showed that Sauropus Blume (including Synostemon F.Muell.) and its related genera Breynia J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. and Glochidion J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. should be united with Phyllanthus to create a monophyletic genus. The relationships within Sauropus and its relationship with Breynia were studied to test/corroborate such a broad definition of Phyllanthus. The molecular phylogenetic analyses show that Sauropus in the broad sense is composed of two distinct groups, the former Australian Synostemon and the Southeast Asian Sauropus in the strict sense with the monophyletic Breynia embedded in the latter. As the phylogeny of the species rich Phyllanthus is still far from completed and the results here strongly support the distinction of monophyletic groups such as Glochidion, former Synostemon, and Sauropus/Breynia. These genera are recognisable, while union with Phyllanthus (suggested by Hoffmann and co-authors in 2006) will turn the latter into an unrecognisable monolithic giant of a genus. It is a much better strategy to use the complete phylogeny of Phyllanthus to render it into smaller, monophyletic genera that can be characterized. The present study shows Synostemon has to be recognised again on generic level. Breynia, the older name, is nested within Sauropus, leading us to transfer the latter to Breynia. Within this broadened Breynia, two subgenera and two sections are distinguished, subgenus Sauropus and subgenus Breynia with section Cryptogynium and section Breynia under the latter.
Description: Promotores: E.F. Smets, P.C. van Welzen
With summary in Dutch
Faculty: Faculteit der Wiskunde en Natuurwetenschappen
Citation: Kanchana, P., 2010, Doctoral thesis, Leiden University
Sponsor: Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organization), Thailand
Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/16170
 

Files in this item

Description Size View
application/pdf Full text 3.028Mb View/Open
application/pdf Cover 1.313Mb View/Open
application/pdf Title page_Contents 57.50Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 1 643.7Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 2 321.8Kb View/Open Full text at publisher site
application/pdf Chapter 3 569.6Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 4 1.033Mb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 5 571.9Kb View/Open
application/pdf Chapter 6 Summary and conclusions 70.12Kb View/Open
application/pdf Summary and conclusions in Dutch 65.04Kb View/Open
application/pdf References 92.16Kb View/Open
application/pdf Curriculum vitae_Acknowledgements 52.20Kb View/Open
application/pdf Propositions 24.21Kb View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)