Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/50156
Documents
-
- Download
- References
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in English
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Dutch
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Bulgarian
- open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in English
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Bulgarian
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Dutch
- open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
- open access
-
- Download
- References
- open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Crowdsourced online dispute resolution
This thesis aims to establish whether CODR can fairly resolve disputes. First, it provides a framework of CODR, analyses the differences between CODR and other dispute resolution schemes, and constructs interpretation of procedural fairness that merges objective and subjective procedural fairness. Second, the research investigates whether the current CODR procedures are fair and proposes a model of a CODR procedure that complies with the interpretation of procedural fairness.
The findings of the...Show more Solving disputes often takes a considerable amount of time and money. That holds for everyone involved. A new type of dispute resolution called Crowdsourced Online Dispute Resolution (CODR) seems to have the potential to offer a cheap, fast, and democratic dispute resolution procedure. Since it is currently not clear whether CODR procedures comply with the requirements of procedural fairness, the attractiveness and the acceptance of CODR procedures may be in discussion.
This thesis aims to establish whether CODR can fairly resolve disputes. First, it provides a framework of CODR, analyses the differences between CODR and other dispute resolution schemes, and constructs interpretation of procedural fairness that merges objective and subjective procedural fairness. Second, the research investigates whether the current CODR procedures are fair and proposes a model of a CODR procedure that complies with the interpretation of procedural fairness.
The findings of the research indicate that CODR can be designed to fairly resolve disputes.Show less
- All authors
- Dimov, D.V.
- Supervisor
- Herik, H. J. van den; Lodder, A.R.
- Committee
- Huls, N.J.H.; Rabinovich, O.; Verheij, H.B.; Zeleznikow, J.; Custers, B.H.M.
- Qualification
- Doctor (dr.)
- Awarding Institution
- eLAW - Leiden University Center for Law and Digital Technologies , Law , Leiden University
- Date
- 2017-06-27
- Title of host publication
- Meijers-reeks
- ISBN
- 9789402805789
Publication Series
- Name
- MI-283